Science on Faith

Science is human venture to understand God's creation

Evolution science attempts to give vague explanation of creation details that are based on faith reasons that cannot be observed.

The science of History sometimes ends up with belief in aliens (that are as mystical and unencountered as pagan gods) when encountered with ancient architecture that modern machinery cannot build. 

Did peacocks or parrots evolve from this?

if yes please provide proof

Proof the God Exists

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRY-QSPAn7M

Evolution is blind faith

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3jrcP-o6Vs

Science will just ignore this - A prediction here with verifiable data

Now science does not venture into things that it CANNOT explain. I am sure I will be ignored on this matter, but if what ever I state here comes to pass, science will just ignore it as chance. I am asserting that it's a prediction from a person who has led many in the science world to become a Roman Catholics. Though I do not personally believe in the RC concepts, I am open minded in believing that people of that faith do demonstrate supernatural abilities.

I have heard numerous believable testimonies of predictions coming true. Hence, I do not want to miss an opportunity to pre-state this one in writing for a world to see. If it becomes true, science must acknowledge.

This is the prediction given:
A couple I know having trouble in having a baby have spent about Rs. 4.5 Lakh over the past 3 years on various infertility treatments. Everything failed. While the wife is an RC husband was an atheist. The husband went through various religious experiences and has now accepted the Christian teachings though in a RC way.

A person who could tell them various facts about their past and current family some even unknown to them but yet verifiable has assured them that they would have a baby by May 2015. I presume we will hear the good new in Aug-Sep this year. The prediction also states that a male child would be born. They have stopped all medical treatments and trust on God for the fulfillment of their wish for having a baby.

I am sure they will have all records of the treatment they have undergone. I hope they will share it with us on later dates. I will claim this prophecy as invalid if I am unable to procure the details. Science has nothing to loose nor would it affect my faith.

I will keep updating the post...   

See how limited a knowledge do they show even of human hand

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaNZ02fRUpc

Search for extraterrestrial life

Recent reports of dwarf icy planets beyond the Kuiper belt shows that we are still learning only more about our solar system. How on earth do the scientist think that they can views some colors through a telescope of other solar systems and determine weather or not it can support life.

Scientists were baffled when they found 1500 year old organic material come back to life when taken out of ice from the poles. They need material evidence to know of life here on earth but when it comes to extraterrestrial life any amount of good guess is good. 

Light ignored for three hundred years!

This is the typical reaction of the scientific world. If something is out of it's welkin, it keeps ignoring reports as rumors.

It was known for three hundred years in recorded history that lights appear from the ground when there are earthquakes. These must be rare events. Not all earthquakes giving off lights. However, nice to hear that it's finally accepted the claims of people who have witnessed them.

Now a new scope of study has emerged when they started investigating. Generating electricity out of one single material.

BBC reports in link below:
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-26462348

Colors of the natural world - What do you think they declare?

Evolutionists claim that the flowers developed colours in order to attract insects who would aid in pollination. It almost sounds like plants think and adapt to make use of the insects that roam around. If the plant did not think and act quickly to manufacture attractive colours, they would die out as a result of not being able to produce seeds.

Trees living up to 2000 years may have time to think and act. But how about plants that live for just 6 months? If evolution requires a lot of time. Plants with life of 5 months would have just perished. And if long living trees evolved from the short life ones how could they ever be there?

Now there are also many plants that do not flower and yet they are all attractive by the coloured leaves they have. What on earth forced them to be colourful? Even beetle nuts and coconuts are colourful. Did they colour themselves to attract the human so that they found food? The simple answer to these questions is that God made nature wonderful so that humans may see and know Him.

You could not be farther away from truth when you believe there's no freewill.

Watch this video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDDC1-_e7hI

Atheists and Scientists who do not believe in freewill try this out - I am sure you will start thinking different. 

Scientist who cannot counter argue this should stop preaching evolution

Watch this video. I assure you none can:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJM39VXTzHs

Debunking Homeopathy - Shameful fallacies from the scientific world

Homeopathy has long been known to treat diseases.

1. Modern science uses electrical sparks to burn off acrochordon. The acrochordon keep returning and the only solution is to burn them off again. Good homeopaths give just a little liquid or globules to consume and completely cures and the recurrence of the same is greatly reduced (I am yet to see a complete cure though).

2. My relatives who are most of the dependent on homeopathy have reported that after various modern medicine treatments for a back pain caused by sports injury failed, they tried homeopathy and now the patient is completely cured.

3. There are millions others reporting that they are cured.

When even celebrities started declaring the curative powers of homeopathy, they brought the field of homeopathy under their scanner. They made a laughter stalk of themselves in my eyes with the kind of method they applied to arrive at a conclusion that there is no scientific evidence that homeopathy works or could work.

They prepared the sample medicines in lab with a kind of robotic dilution techniques. They did not consider samples from normal medicine preparation methods necessary for a comparative study.